Analysis Of The HRM In Google LLC Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Analysis Of The HRM In Google LLC. Answer: Introduction Google LLC is multinational company of American origin and it has operations in the field of technology. The organization mainly specializes in the products and services based on internet which also includes advertising technologies on the internet, software, hardware and cloud computing related activities. Google was established in the year 1998 by Sergey Brin and Larry Page. Google has its headquarters in Mountain View, California which is nicknamed as Googleplex. Google has shown huge growth in its revenues after its inception and this has triggered the launch of various other products, partnerships and acquisitions (Google.com. 2018). Google is known for its unique work process and management of employees. The recruitment process of the company is also quite unique in nature and this led to the huge success of Google. The organization currently has an employee base of more than 57,100 employees of which 30% are female and 70% are males. Google has a rigorous process of recruitment and the employees are hired related to a hierarchy basis. The motivation andemployee management techniques of Google are well-known in the industry and they have named this technique as Innovation Time Off. The engineers of Google are encouraged to spend their time on the various projects that interest them (Google.com. 2018). This report will be mainly based on the analysis of thehuman resource management and talentmanagement techniques that are used by Google for the performance improvement of the employees. Google will also be analysed based on the internal environment in the organization and the external environment where it operates. The different human resource related activities of the company will be analysed based on the different models of strategic human resource management. The process of employee engagement that are undertaken by the organization will be analysed in detail (Albrecht et al. 2015). The entire report will therefore be based on the analysis of the human resource and strategic functions of the company and the ways by which Google operates in the industry. This will help in understanding the major strategy behind the huge success of Google and the secret of its satisfied employees. Analysis of the strategic aims of Google Internal analysis - SWOT Analysis of Google Strengths Google is considered to be the leader in the industry of search engines and it demands the largest share in the market in this domain. The company has more than 65% of the total market share. Google has become a household brand within the years of its operations in the industry and this has further helped the company to gain the position of the most powerful brands (Anitha 2014). Google earns huge revenues from the advertisements and the partnerships with the various third party sites. The huge adoption of the Android systems by the various smartphone companies has helped Google in giving direct competition to Apple. Weaknesses The secrecy maintained by Google regarding its algorithms related to searches and their basic formula acts a weakness for the company. The advertisement rates of Google have faced decline and this has resulted in the decline of the revenues of the company. The business model of Google heavily relies on the advertising related activities and the sales related numbers reveal that about 85% of the total revenue is generated from advertisements. Google also has a lack of the compatibility with the next generation computing related platforms (Bock et al. 2016). Opportunities The greatest opportunity for Google lies in the effort that it can provide in the Android OS which can help them in competing with organizations like Samsung and Apple. Google needs to diversify its revenues that in the non-advertisement area as this can help them in remaining profitable in the market. The introduction of services like Google Play and Google Glasses can act as a game changer for the company in the industry. Cloud computing is another major area where the company has a huge opportunity and they already have experience in the providing services related to storage and cloud-based solutions (Breevaart et al. 2014). Threats The biggest threat to the development and profitability of Google is the rapid rise of social media this has threatened the dominance of Google in the market. The company has to take a major step related to its development so that it can compete with Twitter and Facebook. The other major threat to the profitability of Google is the area of the mobile computing related technologies. This poses a threat towards the operations and huge revenues of Google in the market as the other companies increase their presence in mobile computing (Conway et al. 2016). External analysis - Porters Five Forces of the industry where Google operates Google is an organization which is a popular name among the public irrespective of their geographical locations or demographics. Google is known in the industry for the basic services that is provides to the users. Google is a famous search engine and they mainly provide the largest platform for the search related operations of the various websites. The search engine provides ant type of information that is necessary for the various jobs performed by the people. Google has grown in size since its establishment and this has brought many challenges for the company from the external environment (Cox 2015). The challenges faced by Google with respect to the environment where it operates is discussed based on the Porters Five Forces Framework. Bargaining power of the suppliers Google has its dominance in the local market and the region where it operates. The suppliers of the company belong to different sectors and their type of operations are also different. The bargaining power of the suppliers is low as the competition in the market is low and Google has many suppliers. The company has many suppliers in each of the sectors and this has helped Google in creating a strong position in the market. However, Google has a major competition in the market which is Microsoft and this company poses a huge threat towards the suppliers of the company. The bargaining power of the suppliers are likely to increase that the existing level if the other companies come in competition to Google (Dickson 2017). Threats related to the new entrants in the market The threat of new entries in the market is high for Google as in the fast changing technological world no company can hold the same position for many years. The revenues of the company are mainly generated from the advertisements and this leads to the increase in the threat related to the entry of new organizations in the market. The threat related to the entry other companies in the market need to be taken seriously by Google and they should focus on the continuous improvement of the company processes. The major factors that act in the favour of Google are the loyalty of the customers of the company who have trust on the operations. The costs related to switching of hardware also needs high standards of accuracy and it will also require high efficiency levels of the system (Fleisher and Bensoussan 2015). Competitive rivalry in the market The major competition of the company in the market are Yahoo and Microsoft and they are also trying hard to reach the standards of Google within a short span of time. The online technologies which have advertised relat6ed to the bad and the good practices can affect the attitude and expertise of Google. Google had been operating in a monopoly market as the rules and regulations related to online business had been defined in a proper manner (Hollenbeck and Jamieson 2015). The degree of competition that is faced by Google in the recent times is less as there are only two major competitors. The high level of monopoly that has been developed by Google has helped the company to wipe the competition in the market. The identity of the brand of Google in the market is helpful for the company so that it can fight against the rivals in a fierce manner. The strong impression made by Google in the minds of the consumers has helped them in creating a different p osition in the market (Jackson, Schuler and Jiang 2014). Threats related to substitutes The substitute product of Google will be mainly related to the accuracy and the speed of the search engines and the tools required for searching. The advertisements and the pages that are added in the pages of Google against the will of the customers can also lead to the search for a substitute of the company. The demands of the customers are also increasing with respect to the availability of more services and the superiority of the services that are already provided. The revenues gained by the company from the advertisements are directly linked with the usage and the loss of customers of Google can lead to a huge loss for the company (Keller, Daronco and Cortimiglia 2017). The innovation related to technology requires more number of skilled labour and the high degree of rivalry posed by the companies is also quite tough. The movement of the skilled labour from one company to the other can further cause a loss of revenues for the company. Bargaining power related to the buyers The people who are using Google at present are the buyers of the services provided by the company. There are many ranking forums related to the search related operations and this increases the power of the consumers. The low ranking provided by the customers can lead to a huge loss for the company as it can further affect the choice of the users. Another major issue related to this is that the customers of the company are becoming more and more knowledgeable and this leads to the rise in the demands of free services (Kotler, Berger and Bickhoff 2016). The level of competition for Google search engine is low, however, the company can also lose customers within a short span of time. The search tools can never be perfect as the demands of the customers are also likely to change and the company needs to change its products and offerings accordingly. Strategic human resource policies adopted by Google Strategic human resource management can be defined as the process of attracting the employees, developing the skills of the employees, rewarding the employees for their performance and further retaining the employees. Strategic HRM is mainly related to the benefit of the employees and the organizations as well. Strategic HRM uses the talent of the employees and the opportunities within the organization so that the profitability can be increased (Kramar 2014). The management of human capital has become a major part in the operations of the organizations and their management practices as well. Google has been well-known in the industry for the innovative strategic human resource related policies that they use for the employees. Google has developed a culture in the organization which is employee-centric in nature and the core objective of this culture is the empowerment of the employees. The efficient human resource management policies of Google are another major reason for its popularity in the industry along with its technological capabilities (Kumar and Pansari 2015). The work culture of Google is employee friendly and innovative in nature and it aims to drive the commitment of the employees. The key facts related to the culture of Google are as follows, The employees are committed and are driven by the passion related to innovation. The efficient leadership of the company empowers the environment related to trust in the organization. The environment of learning is created in the organization and it ensures growth and continuous learning. The top management of the company is also committed towards innovation in the technology. The policies of Google are inclusive in nature and it involves the employees in the major functions which further increases diversity (Lengnick-Hall, Lengnick-Hall and Neely 2014). The major reason behind the success of Google is the culture and the work environment that is provided to the employees. The main role in this case is played by the HR of Google and it supports the organizational structure so that they can pursue innovation in the operations. The HR of Google nurtures the innovative and creative culture of the company by formulating the policies that are related to the hiring of the best talent (Mishra, Boynton and Mishra 2014). Recruitment at Google The policies related to human resources in Google mainly deal with the hiring and recruitment of the best employees in the company. The major focus of the recruitment policy is to select the right person for the right position. The number of recruiters who are present in the company are not revealed, however according to the sources these recruiters are highly experienced and well paid professionals. The recruiters focus on hiring people who have huge talent and are compatible to the culture of the company. The candidates have go through a long and complicated process of recruitment before they are hired in the company. The productivity of the employees is an important factor in Google (Mone and London 2014). The pressure related to survival in the company is high and this is the reason behind the high turnover of Google. The working process of Google is a lesson for the other organizations in the same sector. The recruitment process does not only involve the HR of the company it also requires the cooperation of the other departments. Diversity is another major factor of differentiation related to the operations of Google in the market. This is visible in all the departments of the organization and enables Google to maintain the topmost position in the market. The recruitment team of Google consists of members who perform various roles including, candidate developers, research analysts, candidate screeners and process coordinators (Morschett, Schramm-Klein and Zentes 2015). Performance management of employees at Google The HR function of Google handles a major responsibility which is related to the management of performance of the employees. Google provides opportunities to the employees so that they can grow in their own fields and develop their competencies. The rewards provided to the employees for good performance are huge and this helps in motivating them in the improvement of their performance. The subordinates are included in the decisions and the reviews that are conducted in the company (Paill et al. 2014). Two strategic policies of Google The strategic policies of Google related to human resource management are famous for the successful management of the employees in the organization. The two major HR policies of the organization that are applied by Google are as follows, Providing smart perks The employees are provided with many perks in Google and the strategy of Google is mainly to provide a reason for the perks that are being provided. For example, the maternity leave related plans of Google were changed from 12 weeks to around 5 months. The reason behind this perk was also provided by the management which was the high attrition rate of the female employees due to maternity. The addition of maternity was a successful strategy of the company in retaining the female employees (Purce 2014). Little things should not be neglected The small things that happen in the organizations can have large impact on the operations of the organizations. This is another major strategy that is followed by Google. For example, the waiting time of the lunch line should not exceed more than four minutes as it is considered to be enough time for the chatting and making connections of the employees. According to Google the extra time taken can lead to wastage of the resources of the company (Schneider and Blankenship 2017). Recommendations related to the various policies of Google Attraction of talent and retention of talent Google has been able to attract the best talent in the world throughout the years of its operations in the industry. The main emphasis of Google has been on the rewards and benefits provided to the employees. The reward system of Google is different as compared to the performance appraisal strategies applied by the other companies. The major criteria related to the selection of employees in Google are creativity, smartness, alignment with the goals of the organization and the drive towards excellence (Schuler and E. Jackson 2014). The compensation packages that are offered to the employees in Google are the most important and effective HRM tool used by the company. Google provides high wages and salaries to the employees along with the extra benefits like free meals and other perks. The different and innovative design of the company offices helps in the enhancement of the creativity of the employees. The human resource management department of the company uses the process of mentorin g and coaching so that they retain and further develop the skills of the employees (Shields et al. 2015). Employee Engagement The strategies related to employee engagement that are developed by Google are considered to be the best in the industry. Google mainly deals with the usage of talent of the employees and use their ideas to develop the work processes in the organization (Shuck and Reio Jr 2014). The major lessons that are related to the employee engagement related strategies of Google are as follows, The main motto of Google is to provide a good and positive working environment. According to the strategy of Google, the employees are the major part of the workplace and they play a huge role in making the company successful. Google relies on the data and metrics of the everyday operations in the organization so that they can understand the needs of the employees (Sparrow, Brewster and Chung 2016). Google tries to ensure that the working environment is able to inspire the employees so that they are happy in the workplace and are engaged in their jobs. The company allows the employees an amount of time so that they can devote that on a project of their choice. This ensures that the employees are engaged and apply their innovative minds in the work process (Stone and Deadrick 2015). Google is an organization that operates as a democracy and gives importance to the opinions of the employees. The aim of Google is that the employees find the workplace inspiring and motivating. The company gives importance to the feedback of the employees regarding every issue and this helps them in providing the importance that can further motivate them. Barriers of implementation of the recommendations Google has been one of the best organizations related to the recruitment and the selection process. However, Google also has some issues that occur in the process of talent acquisition and retention. The corporate culture of the organization is related to the dependency of Google on the advertising or search related business. The homogeneous corporate culture of Google sometimes restricts it from innovating, evolving and taking risks that can pay off. The movement of the employees of Google to its competitors is another major issue that is being faced by the human resources department of the organization (beda, Alsua and Carrasco 2015). Recommendations to Google Google needs to expand its business avenues instead of depending on the advertisements for its revenues. The culture of the company needs to be developed and changed into a mixed type so that the employees can adopt changes easily and increase innovation. Google has been offering extra incentives to the employees who tend to leave the organization to join their competitors. The organization needs to understand that these employees are not suitable for its growth and they need to act like mature companies and not like new companies like its competitors. Barriers of implementation of new ways Google has many barriers that are related to the implementation of change in the various organizational processes. The changes in the company are relevant and useful for its future operations and the ways by which it can increase its profitability. The major barriers that can occur in the process of change implementation are as follows, Planning Google has been in the topmost position of the market since the time of its inception and this has affected the ways by which they plan to bring changes in the organizational policies. The company has not planned for changes in its processes and have been applying the same policy of offering incentives so that the employees can be retained. Employee resistance The employees who are not willing to work with the company anymore provide resistance to the changes that can be brought in the processes of Google. The reason being that they are more attracted towards the new organizations and are looking for their own short-term benefits (Kumar and Pansari 2015). Conclusion The report can be concluded by stating that the human resource department of an organization plays an important role in the revenues and profitability. The human capital of the company is considered to be the most important in the current business scenario. The recruitment process involves all the major departments of the organization as compared to the earlier situation where only the HR department was responsible for this process. The strategies related to the management of human resources applied by Google are analysed in the report. The ways of managing the employees and engaging the employees in the work process of the organization are also discussed in the report. Google has been analysed based on the internal and external forces that affect the operations of an organization. The recommendations are provided in the report based on ways by which changes can be implemented in the policies of Google. These changes can further help the company is sustaining their operations in a co mpetitive environment. References Albrecht, S.L., Bakker, A.B., Gruman, J.A., Macey, W.H. and Saks, A.M., 2015. Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach.Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance,2(1), pp.7-35. Anitha, J., 2014. Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance.International journal of productivity and performance management,63(3),p.308. Bock, A., Frank, U., Bergmann, A. and Strecker, S., 2016, November. Towards Support for Strategic Decision Processes Using Enterprise Models: A Critical Reconstruction of Strategy Analysis Tools. InIFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling(pp. 41-56). Springer, Cham. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O.K. and Espevik, R., 2014. Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement.Journal of occupational and organizational psychology,87(1), pp.138-157. Conway, E., Fu, N., Monks, K., Alfes, K. and Bailey, C., 2016. Demands or resources? The relationship between HR practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations.Human Resource Management,55(5),pp.901-917. Cox, A., 2015. Sourcing portfolio analysis and power positioning: towards a paradigm shift in category management and strategic sourcing.Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,20(6), pp.717-736. Dickson, P., 2017. The Role of Strategic Analysis in Operations.Strategic Analysis in Support of International Policy Making: Case Studies in Achieving Analytical Relevance, p.111. Fleisher, C.S. and Bensoussan, B.E., 2015.Business and competitive analysis: effective application of new and classic methods. FT Press. Google.com. (2018).Our latest | Google. [online] Available at: https://www.google.com/about/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2018]. Hollenbeck, J.R. and Jamieson, B.B., 2015. Human capital, social capital, and social network analysis: Implications for strategic human resource management.The Academy of Management Perspectives,29(3), pp.370-385. Jackson, S.E., Schuler, R.S. and Jiang, K., 2014. An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management.The Academy of Management Annals,8(1), pp.1-56. Keller, F.H., Daronco, E.L. and Cortimiglia, M., 2017. Strategic tools and business modeling in an information technology firm.Brazilian Journal of Operations Production Management,14(3), pp.304-317. Kotler, P., Berger, R. and Bickhoff, N., 2016. Strategic Frames of Reference: The Key Tools of Strategy Determination, Their Principles, and How They Interact. InThe Quintessence of Strategic Management(pp. 23-53). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Kramar, R., 2014. Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach?.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,25(8), pp.1069-1089. Kumar, V. and Pansari, A., 2015. Measuring the benefits of employee engagement.MIT Sloan ManagementReview,56(4),p.67. Lengnick-Hall, M.L., Lengnick-Hall, C.A. and Neely, A.R., 2014, January. It's Who You Know: A Relationship View of Strategic Human Resource Management. InAcademy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 14430). Academy of Management. Mishra, K., Boynton, L. and Mishra, A., 2014. Driving employee engagement: The expanded role of internal communications.International Journal of Business Communication,51(2),pp.183-202. Mone, E.M. and London, M., 2014.Employee engagement through effective performance management: A practical guide for managers. Routledge. Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H. and Zentes, J., 2015.Strategic international management(pp.978-3658078836).Springer. Paill, P., Chen, Y., Boiral, O. and Jin, J., 2014. The impact of human resource management on environmental performance: An employee-level study.Journal of Business Ethics,121(3), pp.451-466. Purce, J., 2014. The impact of corporate strategy on human resource management.New Perspectives on Human Resource Management (Routledge Revivals),67. Schneider, B. and Blankenship, M.H., 2017. Employee Engagement: What We Know and How to Profit from Doing It.Employment Relations Today,44(3), pp.7-15. Schuler, R. and E. Jackson, S., 2014. Human resource management and organizational effectiveness: yesterday and today.Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People andPerformance,1(1),pp.35-55. Shields, J., Brown, M., Kaine, S., Dolle-Samuel, C., North-Samardzic, A., McLean, P., Johns, R., O'Leary, P., Robinson, J. and Plimmer, G., 2015.Managing Employee Performance Reward: Concepts, Practices, Strategies. Cambridge University Press. Shuck, B. and Reio Jr, T.G., 2014. Employee engagement and well-being: A moderation model and implications for practice.Journal of Leadership OrganizationalStudies,21(1),pp.43-58. Sparrow, P., Brewster, C. and Chung, C., 2016.Globalizing human resource management. Routledge. Stone, D.L. and Deadrick, D.L., 2015. Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management.Human Resource Management Review,25(2), pp.139-145. beda, R., Alsua, C. and Carrasco, N., 2015. Purchasing models and organizational performance: a study of key strategic tools.Journal of Business Research,68(2), pp.177-188.